Smt. Saroj vs M/S Air Force Senior Secondary ... on 21 February, 2017
D.I.D. No. : 2073/16 Date of Institution of the case : 13.08.2009 Date on which reserved for award : 14.02.2017 Date on which award is passed : 21.02.2017 Smt. Saroj W/o Sh. Jai Kishore,...
View ArticleSmt. Meenakshi Sharma vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 20 February, 2017
Page 1 of 12 (Pulastya Pramachala) Special Judge (PC Act) CBI, East District Karkardooma Courts, Delhi Crl. Rev. No.125/16 BRIEF FACTS OF THIS CASE : - 2. Briefly stated, the relevant facts giving rise...
View ArticleC.S. No.58720/16 vs Sh.Dinesh Kumar on 21 February, 2017
2. The brief facts of the present case from the perspective of plaintiff as discernible from the plaint and the documents of the plaintiff are that the plaintiff is a bank...
View ArticleSh. Sanjay Sharma vs M/S Chhabra Builders on 22 February, 2017
File perused. In the present matter, there is no evidence on behalf of the workman. Even the workman has failed to file his affidavit in evidence, as such, there is nothing on...
View Article7.2015 Till 31.12.2016. He ... vs Unknown on 22 February, 2017
2. The defendant was inducted as a tenant at the tenanted premises vide registered Lease Deed Ex. PW1/2 on a monthly rent of Rs.9,000/- for a period of 18 months from 01.07.2015 till 31.12.2016. He...
View ArticleCbi vs . Kartar Singh & Ors on 22 February, 2017
2. After completion of the investigation, a final report (charge-sheet) was filed against aforesaid four accused persons for the offence under Section 306/34 IPC. Upon raising protest, the...
View ArticlePresent Suit Is For Recovery Of ... vs Reliable Packers & Movers Page No....
2. Case of plaintiff is that it is a banking company. That ING Vyasya Bank amalgamated with the plaintiff bank vide order of Reserve Bank of India bearing no. DBR No. PSBD.14476/16.01.136/2014-15 dated...
View ArticleUnknown vs Reliable Packers & Movers on 22 February, 2017
2. Case of plaintiff is that it is a banking company. That ING Vyasya Bank amalgamated with the plaintiff bank vide order of Reserve Bank of India bearing no. DBR No. PSBD.14476/16.01.136/2014-15 dated...
View ArticleUnknown vs M/S. K.L. Saw Mill on 22 February, 2017
2. Case of plaintiff is that it is a banking company duly registered and incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its branch office at Sector -8, Rohini, Delhi. That the ICICI Bank Ltd....
View ArticleSuit No. 8420/16 M/S. Indian ... vs . Rajesh Page 1 Of 4 Pages on 22...
5. Defendant was served with the summons but he did not appear Suit No. 8420/16 M/s. Indian Overseas Company Private Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Page 2 of 4 pages and, accordingly, vide order dated 24.01.2017, he...
View ArticleParas & Lal Babu vs . Prakash on 22 February, 2017
2. Date of intimation of the accident by the Date not mentioned Investigating Officer to the Claims Tribunal. on accident (Clause 2) information report. 3. Date of...
View ArticleSmt. Chanchal vs Sh. Charanjeev Singh on 22 February, 2017
3. M/s ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. ICICI Lombard House, 414 Veer Savarkar Marg, Near Sidhi Vinayak Temple, Parbhadevi, Mumbai - 40002 Through Its Managing Director/Director...
View ArticleSh. Gajraj vs Smt. Kusum Devi on 22 February, 2017
1. This is an appeal filed by Sh. Gajraj & Smt. Malti (defendant no.1 & 2 in the suit) for setting aside the judgement and decree dated 12/02/2016 (for short 'the impugned judgement') passed...
View ArticleRanbir Singh vs . Kanwaljeet Singh Kohli on 22 February, 2017
2. Reply to this application has been filed by the defendant. 3. The relevant facts required for adjudication of the present application are as under: The case of the plaintiff is...
View ArticleSh. Rajesh Lal vs Sh. P. Murugesan on 22 February, 2017
Through Its Managing Director/Director ...Insurer/Respondent no. 2 Date of filing of DAR : 20.01.2016 Reserved on : 21.02.2017 Date of Decision : 23.02.2017 AWARD 1. Claim petitions where no serious...
View ArticleMukesh Bhargava vs The State Of Delhi on 22 February, 2017
2. The above said order has been challenged on the ground that the notice/challan for the offences U/Sec. 101, 79(1) of the DJB Act was raised against the appellant and it was a first...
View ArticleAmit Arora vs State .... on 22 February, 2017
1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of the criminal appeal preferred against the judgment and order of sentence dated 25.10.2016 and 19.11.2016, respectively passed by learned MM,...
View ArticleState vs . Raju on 22 February, 2017
2. After completion of the investigation, the chargesheet was filed in the Court. Copies were supplied to accused and after completion of necessary formalities, charge u/s. 33 of Delhi Excise Act...
View ArticleRanbir Singh vs . Ratan Prakash Taneja on 22 February, 2017
2. Reply to this application has been filed by the defendant. 3. The relevant facts required for adjudication of the present application are as under: The case of the plaintiff is...
View ArticleRanbir Singh vs . Gurmeet Singh on 22 February, 2017
2. Reply to this application has been filed by the defendant. 3. The relevant facts required for adjudication of the present application are as under: The case of the plaintiff is...
View Article
