CA No: 125/2017 Madan Mohan Banga Vs Jaimeet Saran 5 of 5
2. Ld. Counsel for appellant during the course of arguments has submitted that the appellant herein is the fatherinlaw of respondent herein and that he is owner in question of the aforesaid premises. He has further submitted that no notice of the original petition was received from ld. Trial court. He has also submitted that the appellant herein has no relation whatsoever with his son i.e. the husband of the respondent herein. He has also stated that appellant has disowned his said son. He has lastly submitted that the ld. Trial court without serving notice of the original petition and without hearing the appellant herein, has passed the impugned order, which is contrary to law and principles of natural justice and the same has resulted into great prejudice to the appellant herein affecting his valuable right in the subject property.
